Lewis Cass And Andrew Jacksons The Cherokee Removal Act

The Cherokee Removal Act is believed to have been causation of prolonged engagement between the settlers of Georgia, Alabama, and parts of North and South Carolina up until 1836, when Andrew Jackson officially signed it into law. Andrew Jackson had a lot to say about the need for removal of natives and two main reasons why it has been such a lengthy procedure. Another man who also had something to say about the matter at hand was Lewis Cass who was Governor of the Michigan Territory from 1816-1831. He was well known as one of the â€Å"most experienced, and highly thoughtful experts in the country on United States Indian policy and the histories and cultures of the tribes. (114)† Cass, unlike President Jackson, believed Indians could survive,†¦show more content†¦Andrew Jackson in his state of the union address of 1830 had the pleasure to announce his long fought battle in favor of removal had began coming to existence. Humanity and Philanthropy were two of his main p oints for why this has been such a strenuous task put upon the nation by the natives. â€Å"Humanity has often wept over the fate of the aborigines of this country, and philanthropy has been long busily employed in devising means to advert it.†(127) Jacksonbrings up the point regarding Americans moving west and humanity not weeping at the fact that they leave but are rather joyful due to the freedoms of â€Å"body and mind†(128) America grants. Jackson even goes far as asking the American public â€Å"How many thousands of our own people would gladly embrace removing to the west on such conditions?†(128) Jackson also discussed the removal procedure and about how the government can be fair and liberal if they agreed to the laws of the states from which they are present or how the government can be harsh if the alternative for removal isn’t accepted by the natives. Both Andrew Jackson and Cass have similar arguments relating to Philanthropy between Civilize d people and the Indians believing it has failed but what about the will of Young Wolf? It seems from reading that will that Young Wolf had a fair knowledge of Civilized culture after death and how a legal contract between property, money and even slaves wasShow MoreRelatedDid Andrew Jacksons Removal Act Benefit the Indians? Essay1677 Words   |  7 PagesRobert V. Remini shows that Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act benefits the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson made notice of the issue with the Indians in his inaugural speech on March 4, 1829. He declared that he wanted to give humane and considerable attention to the Indian’s rights and wants in respect to the government and people. Jackson knew that meant to get rid of all remaining tribes beyond the Mississippi River. He (Jackson) believed that the Indians would be better off in the west; withoutRead MoreThe Political Issues Of The Indian Removal Act Of 18301154 Words   |  5 PagesThe Political Issues of the I ndian Removal Act of 1830 Former President Andrew Jackson was responsible for putting the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in place. It forcibly removed five civilized Native American tribes— Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole—from the southern United States. The act would stay in effect until the end of the Second Seminole War in 1842. Native Americans’ feelings toward the United States government have changed from one of annoyance to disgust since being takenRead MoreThe Trail Of Tears By Amy Sturgis1286 Words   |  6 PagesTears was a huge turning point seen by Amy Sturgis, as clearly shown in her chapter, â€Å"The Trail of Tears as a Turning Point†. Sturgis have separated how the Trail of Tears has affected history into three categories: the world, the US, and for the Cherokee Nation. All three categories intermingle, affecting one another with either a positive or a negative feedback. The United States perspective on the Native people has drastically changed from President to President. â€Å"George Washington originally startedRead MoreManifest Destiny Essay1433 Words   |  6 Pagesbecause of the Native Americans already living in the West, but that didn’t stop the people of the United States. Overall, American expansion, during 1803-1860, transformed the West and affected the Native Americans because of Manifest Destiny, Indian Removal and the advancement of trade and economics. The first reason for the transformation of the West was the belief of Manifest Destiny. The term Manifest Destiny was a belief that justified the expansion West, it stated that it was the Americans’ GodRead MoreEssays for the American Pageant, 14th Ed.11068 Words   |  45 Pages Based on these ideas, English leaders made decisions that were more advantageous to the mother country than they were to the colonies. While this resulted in some discontent among the colonists, mercantilism by itself was not responsible for the acts of rebellion in 1776. Mercantilism played a role in American independence, but it was only one of a number of ideas and events that were important. Mercantilist ideas emphasized that nations should strive toward economic self-sufficiency and that